VeryDarkMan To enchantment Ruling In Falana And Falz’s Defamation in shape

admin

VeryDarkMan, in two separate motions on notice marked identity/8584/GCM/2024 (among him and Falz) and id/8586/GCM/2024 (wherein Femi Falana is the sole respondent), sought an order from the court to increase the time to are searching for leave to enchantment the court’s ruling.

Arguable social media critic and activist, Vincent Martins Otse aka VeryDarkMan, has implemented to the Lagos state high courtroom for depart to attraction the ruling introduced on October 14, 2024, through Justice M.O. Dawodu in favour of respected lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) and his son, Folarin Falana, additionally called Falz, in an alleged defamation fit.

Falana and his son filed a lawsuit in opposition to VeryDarkMan, disturbing a retraction of allegedly defamatory statements made towards them in a recorded conversation regarding famous cross-cloth cabinet Idris Okuneye, also called Bobrisky, concerning monetary help and legal intervention whilst Bobrisky became detained for naira abuse.

In a letter dated September 26, 2024, signed by Taiwo Olawanle and published on Falz’s Instagram page, Falana’s criminal group addressed VeryDarkMan, the writer of the social media publish alleging that Falz become worried in a scheme to cozy a presidential pardon for Bobrisky, who has faced felony troubles.

in keeping with files, Bobrisky allegedly requested legal recommendation and financial assistance from Falz, requesting N3 million to pay correctional centre officials to at ease VIP treatment all through his detention.

inside the ruling on October 14, Justice Dawodu directed VeryDarkMan, his agents, and buddies to get rid of the defamatory video and feedback approximately the Falanas posted on September 24, 2024, from all his social media handles and pages, pending compliance with the court’s pre-movement protocol.

The court docket additionally limited him from in addition freeing, publishing, or circulating any defamatory motion pictures or feedback approximately the Falanas. examine here.

however, VeryDarkMan, in separate motions on notice marked identity/8584/GCM/2024 (between him and Falz) and identification/8586/GCM/2024 (in which Femi Falana is the sole respondent), sought an order from the court docket to extend the time to are seeking for go away to attraction the court’s ruling.

Punch reports that inside the movement, primarily based on seven grounds and dated October 18, VeryDarkMan argued that “the courtroom order was based totally completely at the respondent’s affidavit.”

Being an interlocutory order, the courtroom’s permission to exercising his constitutional right to appeal is needed.

He contended that while “it’s miles at the court docket’s discretion to grant or refuse leave to appeal, such discretion need to be exercised judicially and judiciously.”

He delivered that a refusal through the courtroom could amount to a miscarriage of justice, because the case entails extensive criminal questions that merit in addition review.

“A refusal to grant leave can also bring about the enforcement of a choice that doesn’t replicate a accurate utility of the law, main to outcomes that can be detrimental now not simplest to the parties involved however also to the administration of justice as an entire.

The appellate courtroom’s position in clarifying and, wherein essential, correcting trial court selections is critical in preserving the integrity of the judicial system.”

In an affidavit deposed to via prison practitioner Oladimeji Joseph, he said that he is privy to the court’s unique findings regarding VeryDarkMan’s lack of ability to compensate the claimant if the judgment is going in opposition to him, and therefore seeks to appeal the court docket’s ruling.

Joseph in addition stated,

“I understand for a reality that depart from this Honourable courtroom have to be obtained earlier than the Defendant can enchantment against the ruling. The Defendant has 14 days from the date of the ruling inside which he have to are searching for the depart of this Honourable courtroom and report an appeal.”

He advised the court docket to furnish the applicant’s request.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *